https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102590

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
My bet is gcc mistaken it for being a dependent type which meaning you can use
the template keyword to workaround the issue. Also gcc 8.x series is over 3
years old so this might be fixed already in a newer version of gcc.

Reply via email to