https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I suspect the same underlying issue is affecting the test on line #243 as well.
[Bug tree-optimization/103161] [12 Regression] Better ranges cause builtin-sprintf-warn-16.c failure
law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Tue, 09 Nov 2021 08:47:06 -0800
- [Bug tree-optimization/103161] ... law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/103... law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/103... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/103... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/103... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/103... aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug testsuite/103161] [12... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
