https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785
--- Comment #17 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> --- (In reply to Pavel M from comment #16) > Note: The #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS is unknown and ignored (leading to FP > issues), however, the __STDC_IEC_559__ is defined to 1. Confused. Yes, and IMHO, with __STDC_IEC_559__ defined to 1, this is a much more severe issue. This PR should not be regarded as an enhancement, but as a real bug (this would be an enhancement only if when __STDC_IEC_559__ is defined to 1, there would be a lack of optimization).