https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #14 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > Thanks! Great you found it so quickly. It is bit stupid code since everything is duplicated twice (for LTO and non-LTO). I have to refactor it: we could have common base of the two summaries and handle most of things in unified way. The problem is that gengtype does not like it, so it will probably need manual GGC annotations. It stil leaves us with a wrong code, right?
