https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101713
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Thanks for reporting this issue. The analyzer sees that "str" is passed to hash_insert as a const pointer, and therefore assumes that hash_insert cannot free it, that hash_insert is merely borrowing a pointer to str, rather than taking ownership. Am I right in thinking that there's a cast somewhere inside the hash table code that at some point casts away the const from the pointer and frees it?
