https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> It would be nice from a QOI point of view (aka DWIM) that even with
> -ffast-math we'd recognize this as a form of FP classification since
> "obviously" the intent was to handle the NaN special case.
How can that be "obviously" the intent if the user explicitly said there
*are* no NaNs?!
Do we want a warning for this? Not that I see how this can be sanely
implemented ;-)
