https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088

Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |segher at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> It would be nice from a QOI point of view (aka DWIM) that even with
> -ffast-math we'd recognize this as a form of FP classification since
> "obviously" the intent was to handle the NaN special case.

How can that be "obviously" the intent if the user explicitly said there
*are* no NaNs?!

Do we want a warning for this?  Not that I see how this can be sanely
implemented ;-)

Reply via email to