https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103502
--- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev <stsp at users dot sourceforge.net> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think you misunderstood what precise means in this context really. > "Higher levels correspond to higher accuracy (fewer false positives). " So was it a false-positive?
