https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103640
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Nick Desaulniers from comment #0) > While we can change this in clang (https://reviews.llvm.org/D115471), I do > think it would be more ergonomic for developers if the order of operands for > the outputs templates matched the order of the asm operands. It is kinda of odd that there is no associated documentation change when you submit a clang change like this too ....
