https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Rodgers <rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > Tom submitted > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590050.html already, > which is slightly different. The primary difference was changing the memory order of the load in _M_do_spin. I may revert that part of the change and submit it separately, as I've noticed one other case where I'd like to change it from RELAXED to SEQ_CST.
