https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104645
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think this should be a P1.
Here is another testcase which shows the same issue but is not a regression:
int foo(unsigned i) {
int t = 0;
if (i)
{
unsigned tt = i % 2u;
t = tt;
}
return t;
}
int foo1(unsigned i) {
unsigned t = i % 2;
unsigned tt = i ? t : 0;
return tt;
}
---- CUT ----
For some reason the code in value_replacement is not able to handle the
different IR.
I have some ideas on how to fix this for GCC 13 though.
