https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <r...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73da9ec55609efa532b9ac85ac2dbe121c134e18

commit r12-8089-g73da9ec55609efa532b9ac85ac2dbe121c134e18
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 11 17:44:14 2022 +0100

    libstdc++: Fix std::basic_stacktrace special members [PR105031]

    The PR points out that there is a non-constant condition used for an
    if-constexpr statement, but there are several other problems with the
    copy, move and swap members of std::basic_stacktrace.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/105031
            * include/std/stacktrace (basic_stacktrace::basic_stacktrace):
            Fix allocator usage in constructors.
            (basic_stacktrace::operator=(const basic_stacktrace&)): Do not
            try to reallocate using const allocator.
            (basic_stacktrace::operator=(basic_stacktrace&&)): Fix
            if-constexpr with non-constant condition. Do not allocate new
            storage if allocator propagates. Do not set _M_size if
            allocation fails.
            (basic_stacktrace::swap(basic_stacktrace&)): Fix typo. Add
            assertion that non-propagating allocators are equal.
            * testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc: New test.
  • [Bug libstdc++/105031] wrong co... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to