https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105308
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm unclear what the request is. Are you proposing this for the parallel std::for_each with an execution policy? That code comes from the PSTL project which is part of LLVM, and maintained by Intel, so enhancements to it should ideally be done upstream.