https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
--- Comment #37 from James Y Knight <foom at fuhm dot net> --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #35) > I think that -Wstrict-flex-arrays will need to be cooperated with > -fstrict-flex-arrays=N, i.e, only when -fstrict-flex-arrays=N is presenting, > -Wstrict-flex-arrays will be valid and report the warnings when see a [0], > or [1], or any trailing array based on N: When -fstrict-flex-arrays is used, I'd expect the existing -Warray-bounds warning to already emit diagnostics in the cases you list, because those cases should no longer be special-cased to act as a FAM, and thus no longer explicitly suppress it.
