https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106325

David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-07-16

--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for filing this bug report.

Near the start of the analysis, it sees:

  ‘arranger_object_unsplit’: event 1
    |
    |../src/gui/backend/arranger_object.c:3021:1:
    | 3021 | arranger_object_unsplit (
    |      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    |      | |
    |      | (1) entry to ‘arranger_object_unsplit’
    |
  ‘arranger_object_unsplit’: event 2
    |
    |../src/gui/backend/arranger_object.c:3043:10:
    | 3043 |   *obj = arranger_object_clone (r1);
    |      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    |      |          |
    |      |          (2) calling ‘arranger_object_clone’ from
‘arranger_object_unsplit’
    |
    +--> ‘arranger_object_clone’: events 3-6
           |
           |../src/gui/backend/arranger_object.c:2568:1:
           | 2568 | arranger_object_clone (const ArrangerObject * self)
           |      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           |      | |
           |      | (3) entry to ‘arranger_object_clone’
           | 2569 | {
           | 2570 |   g_return_val_if_fail (self, NULL);
           |      |           ~                   ~~~~~~                        
           |      |           |                   |                            
                                                  |
           |      |           |                   (5) ...to here               
                                 (6) ‘r1’ is NULL
           |      |           (4) following ‘false’ branch (when ‘self’ is
NULL)...
           |
    <------+

...and so within the g_return_val_if_fail in arranger_object_clone it considers
the case in which "self" (and thus the "r1" param passed to
arranger_object_unsplit) is NULL.

However, I see this declaration in the preprocessed code:

__attribute__((nonnull(1, 2)))
void
arranger_object_unsplit (
  ArrangerObject * r1,
  ArrangerObject * r2,
  ArrangerObject ** obj,
 _Bool fire_events);

and hence the analyzer *ought* to be assuming that r1 and r2 are non-NULL, and
thus not consider the early-bailout case in that g_return_val_if_fail.

Looks like a bug in the analyzer to me; marking as confirmed (reproduced on gcc
trunk).

Reply via email to