https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106534
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > On Fri, 5 Aug 2022, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106534 > > > > --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > Seems as if the ICE is fixed for that file by reverting the following > > commit: > > > > commit r13-1963-gc832ec4c3ec4853ad89ff3b0dbf6e9454e75e8cc > > middle-end: Fix phi-ssa assertion triggers. [PR106519] > > As hinted in the e-mail exchange the earlier two transforms might need > guarding with !diamond_p since IIRC only minmax is capable of dealing > with it? Yes, Though I didn't find any failing cases so I didn't guard store elim. value_replacement is a weird one as it looks like it's already looking for some kind of diamond form. I can guard both to be safe, but that's essentially doing a blind change if I can't reproduce this locally.
