https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #42) > I think this goes wrong in vectorizable_operation which does > > if (using_emulated_vectors_p > && !vect_can_vectorize_without_simd_p (code)) > > to guard this but I'm not sure how this slips through? Ah, it's an internal function. I think we should simply return false during analysis for any vect_emulated_vector_p type in vectorizable_call. Alternatively pattern recognition could also be made to fail but the above is definitely more future proof.
