https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106725
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Thu, 25 Aug 2022, dthorn at google dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106725 > > --- Comment #4 from Daniel Thornburgh <dthorn at google dot com> --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > > As said, GCC shouldn't assume this since leaf is defined at translation > > unit level, not at LTO level. > > Sure, but what prevents GCC from making this assumption? Are all uses of leaf > evaluated before the TUs are merged? Does GCC have some provenance tracking > for > which TU a given function came from in the merged view? Is there a pass I > missed to drop leaf after merging but before it's used? Honza should be able to answer this.
