https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107569
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23) > Created attachment 53866 [details] > gcc13-pr107569.patch > > Updated version of the patch I'll test now (if you don't have any nits). > Besides the thinko I've changed rv_fold to have relation_kind argument rather > than relation_trio, passing the latter to a function that doesn't take > ranges of > the operands/result but just the real values is weird. And yes, OK by me. You're far more qualified to opine in this area :). Thanks.
