https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107815
--- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-11-28 4:39 a.m., jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107815 > > --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Or better yet > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <stdio.h> > > int > main () > { > char *end; > const char *p = "6e-4966"; > long double l = strtold (p, &end); > if (l != __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end != p + 7) > printf ("%Le %s\n", l, end); > p = "1e-4965"; > l = strtold (p, &end); > if (l != 2.0L * __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end != p + 7) > printf ("%Le %s\n", l, end); > p = "2e-4965"; > l = strtold (p, &end); > if (l != 3.0L * __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end != p + 7) > printf ("%Le %s\n", l, end); > return 0; > } > so that we know if it is just the denorm_min() case or also other denormals. I tried both test cases with a recent build of gcc-12. Neither failed at O0 or O2. Nothing was printed.
