https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107926
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This patch I am testing which should fix the issue:
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
index e06f052eb46..0fc382cc5eb 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
@@ -10623,17 +10623,22 @@ process_init_element (location_t loc, struct c_expr
value, bool implicit,
/* Handle superfluous braces around string cst as in
char x[] = {"foo"}; */
- if (string_flag
- && constructor_type
+ if (constructor_type
&& !was_designated
&& TREE_CODE (constructor_type) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (constructor_type))
&& integer_zerop (constructor_unfilled_index))
{
if (constructor_stack->replacement_value.value)
- error_init (loc, "excess elements in %<char%> array initializer");
- constructor_stack->replacement_value = value;
- return;
+ {
+ error_init (loc, "excess elements in %<char%> array initializer");
+ return;
+ }
+ else if (string_flag)
+ {
+ constructor_stack->replacement_value = value;
+ return;
+ }
}
if (constructor_stack->replacement_value.value != NULL_TREE)
