https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Because it would be an ABI break. It's a good option if backwards compatibility is not required, I've suggested it before.
redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Sat, 03 Dec 2022 01:27:02 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Because it would be an ABI break. It's a good option if backwards compatibility is not required, I've suggested it before.