https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yep, that would just be confusing. If "not unpoison the shadow for *a" is useful and no_sanitize("all") shouldn't cover that then no_unpoison_shadow would have been better.