https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yep, that would just be confusing.  If "not unpoison the shadow for *a" is
useful and no_sanitize("all") shouldn't cover that then no_unpoison_shadow
would have been better.

Reply via email to