https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88860
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> --- 2022-12-26 Jonathan Grant <j...@jguk.org> * gcc/doc/extend.texi: Bugzilla 88860 - Clarify online manual infelicities >From 8b142ad8973dc67289e197e30966490a944e4819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Grant <j...@jguk.org> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 20:58:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Bugzilla 88860 - Clarify gcc online manual infelicities Signed-off-by: Jonathan Grant <j...@jguk.org> --- gcc/doc/extend.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi index adba057c190..88fc625050b 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -9190,7 +9190,7 @@ have to optimize it to just @code{return 42 + 42;}. This section describes the syntax with which @code{__attribute__} may be used, and the constructs to which attribute specifiers bind, for the C language. Some details may vary for C++ and Objective-C@. Because of -infelicities in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here +limitations in the grammar for attributes, some forms described here may not be successfully parsed in all cases. There are some problems with the semantics of attributes in C++. For -- 2.37.2