https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512
Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com
--- Comment #11 from Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com> ---
Macros and __has_feature are equally expressive, sure, but why should Clang
change what it’s been doing from the start because GCC doesn’t want to be
compatible with how it’s always done it? It seems a bit rude to expect Clang to
change when it was the one to define how these worked first and GCC took its
implementation. It’s not like it’s a complicated thing for GCC to implement,
and it should really have done so when it added sanitizer support in order to
be fully compatible rather than do things differently and force users to
support both ways in their code (which, to this day, isn’t reliably done, so
there is code out there that only works with Clang’s sanitizers).
