https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104321
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1) > I think it is not only dead code but it should be also removed: > > Glancing at the code, the 'data = NULL;' does not make sense (cf. > 'memcpy(lhs, rhs)' above, lhs is data+offset) – and also does not match the > comment. > Besides, all testcases seem to be happy with that line being dead code So we can just remove this dead code as obvious and finally close the PR?
