https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107949
Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> How would GCC know no extension is needed? The asm template is not parsed
> at all, by design. Making h1 an unsigned char might solve it here?
The version with the inline asm isn't what Jens is worried about, that gives
the generated code he wants (ie, no rlwinm). He asking why the fully C version
of the test case adds the unneeded rlwinm.
