https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108848
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|template keyword |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
|incorreclty required to |template keyword
|access template class |incorreclty required to
|static member of |access template class
|non-dependent expression |static member of
|using member syntax in |non-dependent expression
|dependent context |using member syntax in
| |dependent context
Known to work| |5.1.0
Known to fail| |10.4.0, 11.3.0, 12.2.0,
| |13.0, 5.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Testcase exhibiting a regression relative to GCC 5.1:
template <class T>
struct tag_t {
template <class Sig>
static const Sig* smbr();
};
template <class T>
constexpr tag_t<T> tag {};
template<class T>
void f()
{
auto t = tag<int>.smbr<void>();
}
Started with r226642.
