https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #6)
> There's r13-1113 with introduced the use of visible().
+ /* Visibility attributes are used by the debugger. */
+ set_visibility_for_decl (decl->csym, decl);
+
DECL_INSTANTIATED (decl->csym) = (decl->isInstantiated () != NULL);
set_linkage_for_decl (decl->csym);
}
@@ -2447,3 +2433,37 @@ set_linkage_for_decl (tree decl)
if (DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl))
return d_weak_linkage (decl);
}
+
+/* NODE is a FUNCTION_DECL, VAR_DECL or RECORD_TYPE for the declaration SYM.
+ Set flags to reflect visibility that NODE will get in the object file. */
+
+void
+set_visibility_for_decl (tree node, Dsymbol *sym)
hmmm.. should the call be "set_visibility_for_decl (decl, decl->csym); ?
or should the signature of set_visibility_for_decl() be
set_visibility_for_decl (Dsymbol *sym, tree node)?
or maybe I misread the comment....
