https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8) > Sure. Even compressed with xz, the tarballs are too large for bugzilla, > so I've placed them at > > https://www.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/~ro/files/ti.s2.tar.xz > https://www.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/~ro/files/ti.s3.tar.xz > > > Also, check if you are using the same d21 binary, another possibility might > > be > > miscompiled d21. > > Both the dumps and the objects/assembler output were created with the > same d21 binary, just the -fno-checking/-fchecking=1 difference. But the typeinfo.s is the same in both tarballs, optimized dump too, and while some RTL dumps differ slightly in used addresses, I see no code changes in those either.
