https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109369
--- Comment #4 from Pali Rohár <pali at kernel dot org> --- I wanted to point that marking _pei386_runtime_relocator() function with __attribute__((used)) is working fine. And whether _pei386_runtime_relocator() should participate in LTO at all? I would rather ask, why not? Is there any specific reason why _pei386_runtime_relocator() should not be compiled with LTO? I would expect from gcc/ld that whole application can be compiled with LTO.
