https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109516

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yann Droneaud from comment #4)
> 
> > While clang decided that the type is still unsigned long long.
> 
> AFAICT, there's no unsigned long long involved in my example.

Sorry unsigned long. Similar thing.

Reply via email to