https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109632
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2023-04-27
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
Have a (still hacky) patch that also fixes the example in
comment 4, giving:
fadd s1, s1, s3
fadd s0, s0, s2
ret
Will work on it a bit more before sending an RFC. Can imagine
the approach will be somewhat controversial!
