https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109913
--- Comment #6 from rep.dot.nop at gmail dot com <rep.dot.nop at gmail dot com> --- On 21 May 2023 01:27:29 CEST, "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109913 > >--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >(In reply to rep.dot....@gmail.com from comment #4) >> On 20 May 2023 00:39:45 CEST, "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" >> <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109913 >> > >> >Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: >> > >> > What |Removed |Added >> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Target Milestone|--- |14.0 >> > >> >> Ok. I don't have time for this, let's revert it. > >As I mentioned the patch to libobjc is simple so please don't revert it just >yet. I just need someone to test the patch I attached. > Yeah, but it's a can of worms. I'd revert it, but if anyone wants to have a look, then fine.
