https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109960

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We could have a pattern that does:

`(a & CST) != 0 ? 1: (bool)a` -> `a & (CST|1) != 0` to fix this I think.

Reply via email to