https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110235

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu <liuho...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58e61a3ab1c13b6d5b07d86a30cf48a46e0345c8

commit r14-1916-g58e61a3ab1c13b6d5b07d86a30cf48a46e0345c8
Author: liuhongt <hongtao....@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 14 10:34:32 2023 +0800

    Reimplement packuswb/packusdw with UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE instead of original
us_truncate.

    packuswb/packusdw does unsigned saturation for signed source, but rtl
    us_truncate means does unsigned saturation for unsigned source.
    So for value -1, packuswb will produce 0, but us_truncate produces
    255. The patch reimplement those related patterns and functions with
    UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE instead of us_truncate.

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            PR target/110235
            * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_split_mmx_pack): Use
            UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE instead of original us_truncate for
            packusdw/packuswb.
            * config/i386/mmx.md (mmx_pack<s_trunsuffix>swb): Substitute
            with ..
            (mmx_packsswb): .. this and ..
            (mmx_packuswb): .. this.
            (mmx_packusdw): Use UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE instead of original
            us_truncate.
            (s_trunsuffix): Removed code iterator.
            (any_s_truncate): Ditto.
            * config/i386/sse.md (<sse2_avx2>_packuswb<mask_name>): Use
            UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE instead of original us_truncate.
            (<sse4_1_avx2>_packusdw<mask_name>): Ditto.
            * config/i386/i386.md (UNSPEC_US_TRUNCATE): New unspec_c_enum.

Reply via email to