https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 55498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55498&action=edit also change address register when applying the peephole The attached patch should fix the issue without removing the peephole optimization. If the eliminated register is in the memory address operand, then the memory operand will be updated respectively. Does anybody still has access to the system where this bug happened? I'd appreciate any testing support.
