[Bug c++/110064] spurious missing initializer for member for anonymous

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110064

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpola...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80

commit r14-2657-gb1ae46bdd19fc2aaea41bc894168bdaf4799be80
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 19 13:31:52 2023 -0400

    c++: -Wmissing-field-initializers and empty class [PR110064]

    Let's suppress -Wmissing-field-initializers for empty classes.

    Here I don't think I need the usual COMPLETE_TYPE_P/dependent_type_p
    checks.

            PR c++/110064

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * typeck2.cc (process_init_constructor_record): Don't emit
            -Wmissing-field-initializers for empty classes.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/warn/Wmissing-field-initializers-3.C: New test.