https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110796
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org> --- Thanks for the quick response! (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does pr91323.c fail on arm? No, all its tests pass: PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O0 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O0 execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O1 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O1 execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O3 -g execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -Os (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -Os execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr91323.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
