https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110848

--- Comment #10 from Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> Personally I'd like it diagnosed in GNU modes, but this is pretty much the
> poster child for "conforming extension diagnosed with -pedantic" so I can
> see the argument for not diagnosing it by default.

Agreed -- I also see the argument for not diagnosing it by default. Normally I
wouldn't suggest such a thing and I would not consider this to be a precedent
to be applied to other extensions if it does get warned on by default. (I think
the only other extension that might maaaayyyybbbbeeee be in the same category
would be nested functions in C, but I've not spent nearly enough time
researching that one to be sure.)

Reply via email to