https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94427
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
With profile feedback on zen4 we now get hottest loops as:
│ dc[k] = dc[k-1] + tpdd[k-1]; ▒
│16b0:┌─ vmovd (%r14,%rdx,1),%xmm2 ▒
0.15 │ │ vpaddd %xmm2,%xmm0,%xmm0 ▒
5.79 │ │ vmovd %xmm0,0x4(%rax,%rdx,1) ▒
│ │if ((sc = mc[k-1] + tpmd[k-1]) > dc[k]) dc[k] = sc; ▒
8.04 │ │ vmovd (%r15,%rdx,1),%xmm7 ▒
0.16 │ │ vmovd (%rcx,%rdx,1),%xmm2 ▒
0.41 │ │ vpaddd %xmm7,%xmm2,%xmm2 ▒
│ │if (dc[k] < -INFTY) dc[k] = -INFTY; ▒
0.71 │ │ vmovdqa _IO_stdin_used+0x560,%xmm7 ◆
1.07 │ │ vpmaxsd %xmm7,%xmm2,%xmm2 ▒
0.73 │ │ vpmaxsd %xmm0,%xmm2,%xmm0 ▒
5.83 │ │ vmovd %xmm0,0x4(%rax,%rdx,1) ▒
│ │for (k = 1; k <= M; k++) { ▒
5.86 │ │ add $0x4,%rdx ▒
1.40 │ ├──cmp %rdx,%r13 ▒
0.00 │ └──jne 16b0 ▒
no time is spent in cold section.
Without profile I get:
88.80% hmmer_peak.chn- [.] P7Viterbi ◆
5.10% hmmer_peak.chn- [.] sre_random ▒
2.31% hmmer_peak.chn- [.] FChoose ▒
1.35% hmmer_peak.chn- [.] RandomSequence ▒
so no time in cold section either.
internal loop almost identical:
│17e0:┌─ vmovd (%r11,%rdi,4),%xmm3 ▒
0.07 │ │ mov %rdi,%r8 ▒
0.09 │ │ vpaddd %xmm3,%xmm0,%xmm0 ▒
6.20 │ │ vmovd %xmm0,0x4(%rdx,%rdi,4) ▒
│ │if ((sc = mc[k-1] + tpmd[k-1]) > dc[k]) dc[k] = sc; ▒
7.00 │ │ vmovd (%rax,%rdi,4),%xmm6 ▒
0.19 │ │ vmovd (%r10,%rdi,4),%xmm3 ▒
0.16 │ │ vpaddd %xmm3,%xmm6,%xmm3 ◆
│ │if (dc[k] < -INFTY) dc[k] = -INFTY; ▒
1.25 │ │ vmovdqa _IO_stdin_used+0x600,%xmm6 ▒
0.89 │ │ vpmaxsd %xmm6,%xmm3,%xmm3 ▒
0.46 │ │ vpmaxsd %xmm0,%xmm3,%xmm0 ▒
5.85 │ │ vmovd %xmm0,0x4(%rdx,%rdi,4) ▒
│ │for (k = 1; k <= M; k++) { ▒
6.02 │ │ inc %rdi ▒
2.48 │ ├──cmp %r8,%r9 ▒
0.00 │ └──jne 17e0 ▒
However the hottest loop seems to be completely elsewhere then shown by you
since it is FP loop and yours seems integer?
