https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paul Keir from comment #4) > I believe P2448R2 would only allow the code, without the static_assert. > Explicitly calling `test()`, `Jam::Jam()` and then `Jam::ft()` here would > mean evaluating a non-constexpr function (i.e. `ft`). ft is > *constexpr-suitable*, but still needs the `constexpr` specifier when it is > constant evaluated. I agree.
