https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111613

            Bug ID: 111613
           Summary: Bit field stores can be incorrectly optimized away
                    when -fstore-merging is in effect
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: gcc at kempniu dot pl
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 56002
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56002&action=edit
Preprocessed reproducer

This is the simplest reproducer I could come up with:

        $ cat bitfield.c
        #include <stdio.h>
        #include <stdlib.h>

        struct bitfield {
                unsigned int field1 : 1;
                unsigned int field2 : 1;
                unsigned int field3 : 1;
        };

        __attribute__((noinline)) static void
        set_field1_and_field2(struct bitfield *b) {
                b->field1 = 1;
                b->field2 = 1;
        }

        __attribute__((noinline)) static struct bitfield *
        new_bitfield(void) {
                struct bitfield *b = (struct bitfield *)malloc(sizeof(*b));
                b->field3 = 1;
                set_field1_and_field2(b);
                return b;
        }

        int main(void) {
                struct bitfield *b = new_bitfield();
                printf("%d\n", b->field3);
                return 0;
        }
        $ gcc -O2 -o bitfield bitfield.c
        $ ./bitfield
        0
        $ gcc -O2 -fno-store-merging -o bitfield bitfield.c
        $ ./bitfield
        1

Removing one of the stores from set_field1_and_field2() makes the issue
go away.  Moving "b->field3 = 1;" below the call to
set_field1_and_field2() also makes the issue go away.

This was originally found for the following GCC version:

        $ gcc -v
        Using built-in specs.
        COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc
        COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.2.1/lto-wrapper
        Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
        Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-bootstrap
--prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu
--with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cet=auto
--enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie
--enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1
--enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--disable-werror
        Thread model: posix
        Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
        gcc version 13.2.1 20230801 (GCC) 

However, I have subsequently confirmed that it also happens on the
current master branch.

A git bisect points at the following commit as the culprit (first
included in GCC 12.1.0):

        commit 22c242342e38ebffa6bbf7e86e7a1e4abdf0d686
        Author: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
        Date:   Thu Nov 18 17:50:19 2021 +0100

            IPA: fix reproducibility in IPA MOD REF

            gcc/ChangeLog:

                    * ipa-modref.c (analyze_function): Do not execute the code
                    only if dump_file != NULL.

Reverting this change on top of current master makes the issue
disappear, so it looks legit to me.

Disassembly of new_bitfield() for "gcc -O2":

           0x0000000000001190 <+0>:     sub    $0x8,%rsp
           0x0000000000001194 <+4>:     mov    $0x4,%edi
           0x0000000000001199 <+9>:     call   0x1040 <malloc@plt>
           0x000000000000119e <+14>:    mov    %rax,%rdi
           0x00000000000011a1 <+17>:    call   0x1180 <set_field1_and_field2>
           0x00000000000011a6 <+22>:    add    $0x8,%rsp
           0x00000000000011aa <+26>:    ret

Disassembly of new_bitfield() for "gcc -O2 -fno-store-merging":

           0x0000000000001190 <+0>:     sub    $0x8,%rsp
           0x0000000000001194 <+4>:     mov    $0x4,%edi
           0x0000000000001199 <+9>:     call   0x1040 <malloc@plt>
           0x000000000000119e <+14>:    orb    $0x4,(%rax)
           0x00000000000011a1 <+17>:    mov    %rax,%rdi
           0x00000000000011a4 <+20>:    call   0x1180 <set_field1_and_field2>
           0x00000000000011a9 <+25>:    add    $0x8,%rsp
           0x00000000000011ad <+29>:    ret

Reply via email to