https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111780
Bug ID: 111780 Summary: Missed optimization of '(t*4)/(t*2) -> 2' Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn Target Milestone: --- Hello, we found some optimizations (regarding Arithmetic optimization) that GCC may have missed. We would greatly appreicate if you can take a look and let us know what you think. Given the following code: https://godbolt.org/z/G9rWK7c3q int n1; void func1(int a){ if(a>1&&a<4) n1=(a+a+a+a)/(a+a); } Different from PR 111718, this missed optimization appears to be due to a missed pattern: (t*4)/(t*2) -> 2 # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT # RANGE [irange] int [8, 8][12, 12] NONZERO 0xc _3 = a_7(D) * 4; # RANGE [irange] int [4, 4][6, 6] NONZERO 0x6 _4 = a_7(D) * 2; # RANGE [irange] int [1, 3] NONZERO 0x3 _5 = _3 / _4; # .MEM_9 = VDEF <.MEM_8(D)> n1D.2761 = _5; Or a more general pattern: (t*m)/(t*n) -> m/n , where m and n are constants. Thank you very much for your time and effort! We look forward to hearing from you.