https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111842

--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to n.deshm...@samsung.com from comment #5)
> > The code is part of a third party library hence adding a explicit cast is
> > not possible.
> 
> Well that third party library is NOT valid C++ code ... The whole point of
> the warning (and the reason why -Wno-pedantic does not turn off the warning)
> is point that out and more over point out the code should be fixed.

That is not a reason that I have ever heard for not assigning a flag to a
warning before. I was under the impression that the principle of "All warnings
should have a flag assigned to them" held regardless of how invalid the code
they warn about is, or how badly said code should be fixed. Again, see bug
44209.

Reply via email to