https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608
--- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #14)
> Created attachment 56313 [details]
> inline minloc with mask
>
> This patch adds support for {min,max}loc with mask.
Awesome, thank you!
> It is not 100% testsuite clean as there are (runtime) error messages that
> regress slightly for maxloc_bounds_{4,5,6,7}.f90
>
>
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #11)
> >
> > > The problem could be with the initialization of loop iteration variables.
> > > (...)
> > > Unfortunately, this conditional initialization seems to
> > > confuse the optimizers a lot.
> > >
> > On closer look, the conditional initialization doesn't seem to be that
> > confusing (at least in the problematic case), as it's removed early (ccp1)
> > in the pipeline. The loop iteration variables remain initialized with phis,
> > but that's because of the loops.
>
> Unfortunately, this is true for rank 1 arrays, but not for higher ranks.
> Constant values are slowly propagated to the phi arguments as optimization
> passes are run, but no simplification of the control flow happens as soon as
> multiple loop levels are involved.
>
> Need to look into the dim argument next.
It's very much appreciated! this should help greatly! Sorry I hadn't reply to
the previous message. Finishing up some work for stage-1.
