https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94787
Tavian Barnes <tavianator at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tavianator at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from Tavian Barnes <tavianator at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
> I actually posted a patch for this and popcount(x) > 1 given the reverse
> transformation is faster on all targets - even if they have popcount
> instruction (since they are typically more expensive). This is true on x86
> as well, (x-1) <u (x & -x) is never slower than using popcount.
There's also these:
(x-1) <u (x ^ (x-1))
-x >u (x ^ -x)
