https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111554
--- Comment #12 from Maxim Kuvyrkov <mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > (In reply to Maxim Kuvyrkov from comment #10) > > This is, mostly, a dup of PR96388. > > With the problem in PR96388 fixed, I'm seeing strange -ftime-report > > reporting that [wrongly?] attributes a lot of time to alias analysis. > > You can try -ftime-report -ftime-report-details (yeah, two options), > this lists "dependent" times in other timevars beyond the passes using them. Ack, thanks, Richard. Posted patch in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/637419.html .
