https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448
--- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Harald, I had forgotten about this PR because the fix became incorporated in the patch for PR89645. In consequence, pr87448.f90 disappeared from the pr87477 failures :-) One of the last tasks before submitting the fix-up patch for PR89645 was to remove this chunk because I couldn't understand why it was there. Thanks for the reminder. Paul On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 17:49, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448 > > --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) > > Created attachment 56484 [details] > > Fix for this PR > > > > Somehow this missed being a blocker for the ASSOCIATE meta-bug. > > > > The patch is so unbelievably simple that I am going to think about it > for 24 > > hours, even though it regtests just fine :-) > > And it is so simple that you seem to have forgotten about it... > > Are you going to pursue it? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
