https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113104
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue <fxue at os dot amperecomputing.com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > See my proposal on the mailing list to lift the restriction of sticking to a > single vector size, I think this is another example showing this. If you > use BB level vectorization by disabling loop vectorization but not SLP > vectorization the code should improve? Yes, the loop is fully unrolled, and BB SLP would. I could not find the proposal, would you share me a link? Thanks
