https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113115
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #4) > Yes, I agree it's duplicated of PR109987, Jeevitha's commit just exposed > this known issue, since we are in stage 3, I wonder if we can go with > power9-vector guarding first > (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587310.html) since > power9-vector still exists in this release, and we can try to remove these > workaround options in next release. (Sorry that I missed to follow up the > power{8,9}-vector removal) I really dislike the -mpower{8,9}-vector options, but maybe it's too late to remove them for this release? I'm not sure how involved/invasive that patch would be. Segher, do you have a preference on remove them now or use the workaround above and remove in the next release?
